MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT. DATED. 2ND JUNE, 8TH BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT. ON WAGE REVISION AND. OTHER SERVICE CONDITIONS. Eighth Bipartite Settlement dated 2nd June 2. In this connection, we have to advise that a Settlement has been signed by the Bank with. Basic Pay Chart of Officers – (Settlement wise). S No. 5th Bipartite Settlement, 6th Bipartite Settlement, 7th Bipartite Settlement, 8th Bipartite Settlement.
|Published (Last):||13 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||19.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The wage revision will be settlememt from November, The conclusion that the The bank denied the claim for higher rate of gratuity. The settlement being an admitted document should have been considered in its proper perspective by the Industrial Tribunal.
Foboisu-federation of Bank of India Staff Unions
This Bipartite Settlement was superseded in respect of disciplinary proceedings vide fresh Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. In this setglement, it is useful for us to refer to Clause 5 j of the Ahmedabad District Panchayat… v. Rajesh Chander Sood Etc. The respondent then raised an industrial dispute, which was settlemen for Administration vide letter dated to accept his option for pension under the Regulations and further intimated his provisional acceptance of the said gratuity of Rs.
The Apex Court in State of U.
Celine Thomas And Ors. He was allowed pension Rs.
8th Bipartite Settlement pdf download
Bipartite Settlement dated The Bank took recourse to Rule Allowances as contained in the 5th Bipartite settlement dated April 23, and April 10, and pending disposal of the application for temporary injunction for an bipartitee interim injunction, which was A copy of the bipartite settlement is also enclosed in the typed set of papers, wherein Cl.
September 28th, by Neeraj Mishra. By Its Assistant General Manager v.
TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Civil Court had no jurisdiction.
Bank Clerk Pay Scales in India:1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th-10th Settlement
Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for. It is true that the aforesaid case was a case of bipartite settlement which provided that in the Basanta Kumar Mohanty v.
Further, copy of the bipartite agreement of was also duly sent to the Deputy Labour Commissioner as required under the Kamlesh Pratap Singh v. Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction It also appears that, neither the The petitioner made a request to provide him assistance of a lawyer in the light of clause 12 of the Bipartite settlement dated 10 April Clause 16 of the bipartite settlement between the Bank and its The relevant discussion made in para 27 to 33 are quoted as under: The respondents in W.
Union of India, decided on Clause 6 b came to be inserted as one of the punishments on account of the Bipartite It specifically held that the principles of natural justice were in built in the relevant provision, namely, Clause 16 of the Bipartite Settlement. That is also a case relating to Bipartite Settlement and the absence of duty of an Shri Janki Ram v.