Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume I. Organization and Procedures. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc ) was first published in in two volumes and contained a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously. Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume II. Design Certification and. Continuing Airworthiness. Approved by the Secretary General.
|Published (Last):||3 November 2005|
|PDF File Size:||3.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.30 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Limitations and Constraints 4.
For the purposes of this advisory, recognition is defined as the process by which an AA assesses and acknowledges another AA as being a competent regulator, empowered with the necessary authority, infrastructure, resources and mechanisms to ensure aviation safety. Information is provided related to:.
Timely response is required where airworthiness is affected, which means devising and provisioning rectification action, and promulgating the necessary information to restore safety levels.
If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user.
Common to the efforts between these agencies is the use of a standardized assessment tool, based on ICAO documents references g. When granting recognition, the TAA will specify any associated terms or condition.
There are currently a number of initiatives aimed at harmonizing the approach to airworthiness regulation between MAAs and for achieving mutual recognition. While MAAs may closely align with aiworthiness of the international civilian airworthiness processes, by necessity, military aviation has a different risk context and will employ military design standards. Normally, these work products will have received an airworthiness approval or other form of authorization from aitworthiness AA.
As stated in para 4.
Source for ICAO Airworthiness Manual (doc ) – PPRuNe Forums
Finally, in the military context, recognition can improve flexibility and capacity during joint operations. Recognition can be unilateral, bilateral or multilateral. The planning phase is used to review the rationale for the AA recognition and establish the recognition plan.
The government statutory authority in each country that oversees the approval and regulation of civil aviation. This also includes acceptance of FAA organizational approvals mnual to maintenance, design, manufacturing dlc materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products. While the review process includes both a desktop and an onsite review, the output of the desktop review can be sufficiently comprehensive to preclude the requirement for the onsite review.
Reference j represents a TAA staff instruction that covers how companies providing services under contract to DND are recognized. A recognition does not expire. The recognition plan can be used to provide the rationale for a direct recognition, without completion of the MARQ or an onsite evaluation.
Cranfield University Content control: Depending on how it is structured within the state, the airworthiness authority may be established as a sub-component of the larger Civil Aviation Authority. Within a military organization, airworthiness and aviation responsibility may be spread across a number of organizations, and enforcement may only be possible through internal regulations, rules and contracts.
In the words of ICAO:. Although the owner bears the legal responsibility for continuing airworthiness, there is very much a shared responsibility between:. It is useful to compare Continued and Continuing as they are sometimes used interchangeably. The process by which the TAA will undertake this recognition could include:. Furthermore, TAA recognition of another AA neither implies, nor requires, that the authority must make any changes to their airworthiness management systems as a result of the recognition.
The report provides an airworthinees assessment of acceptability and identifies any areas that require clarification through an onsite review. Recognition — Airwoorthiness Aviation Authorities 4. Recognition, therefore, does not transfer any legal responsibilities from the TAA to the recognized AA. Retrieved from ” https: The process by which the TAA will undertake this recognition could include: The national military airworthiness authority of a state responsible for the airworthiness of the military aircraft of that state.
For operators based outside the EU, for whom EASA regulations do not apply, continuing airworthiness is still managed in a controlled manner but the regulations are within the rules for the operator. Furthermore, there is no airwoethiness, internationally recognized organization that sets ajrworthiness or harmonizes the military airworthiness and aviation requirements of MAAs.
Once the regulatory Section Heads have completed their reviews, they provide a summary of their findings to DTAES 2, who collates them into a preliminary report. It may be necessary to develop limitations and conditions associated with the recognition, based upon risk assessment of any gaps in documentation or information. To enable the provisions of these two TAM dic, there is a requirement to identify the other regulatory aireorthiness that are acceptable to the TAA and detail the methodology used to establish acceptability.
Reference should also be made to M. Terms, conditions and sustainment requirements are normally articulated in a recognition certificate and the supporting documentation. Key coordinated efforts have been sponsored by:. Sustainment usually relates to the requirement to communicate any change to the conditions under which the recognition was originally issued.
ICAO DOC 9760
The generic term for any of the following: The process used by the TAA for establishing acceptability of the work and artefacts of another airworthiness regulatory authority is called recognition. Recognition of Airworthiness Authorities Effective Date: It remains the responsibility of the TAA to account for any differences in standards and processes, and to decide how any identified gaps are to be managed.
Continuing Airworthiness management is the process by which an aircraft is kept in a condition where it remains airworthy throughout its life – or in other wordsi. DTAES 2 maintains a record of individual evaluator findings and coordinates with the AA being assessed to build a schedule for the onsite review.
Military Authorities Recognition Question Set. The four sub-sections are:. This standardized assessment tool has been tailored for the military context and takes the form of a question set called the Military Authorities Recognition Question set MARQ reference i.
For the DND TAA and the Technical Airworthiness Program, this relates to airworthiness certification, production oversight and airworthiness inspection continuing airworthiness.