These journalists published the back seat conversations in a book with the name “The Endstra-Tapes” omitting only fillers such as “um” and. Commentaar op de Endstra-Tapes zaak over de vraag of op de ‘ achterbankgesprekken’ auteursrecht rust. De auteur meent van wel en bekritiseert de uitspraak. These journalists published these conversations in a book with the name ‘the Endstra-tapes’ only omitting too many ‘ers’, dots and certain.

Author: Guzshura Arakasa
Country: Canada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 10 June 2016
Pages: 110
PDF File Size: 16.35 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.53 Mb
ISBN: 641-8-20229-177-4
Downloads: 88071
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Taull

Endstra’s final work? Dutch copyright: scope of protection remains very wide

In this case the appellate court could avoid a discussion about copyright and article 10 EHRM, because tapex already concluded that the conversations were not protected by copyright. The possibility that commercial gain could be derived from the publication is irrelevant. You are commenting using your WordPress. Follow Please login to follow content. Others believe the Supreme Court is right and that unintended creations deserve to attract copyright.

Hetty rated it it was ok Jun 22, Suzan rated it liked it Feb 20, Germain added it Aug 28, A brief explanation is not out of place here. Tspes official report eventually also made its way onto the Internet and was available on the website of Quote magazine.

Netherlands : No Copyright in Recorded Conversations with Extortion Victim

Inthe Dutch Supreme Court determined that also a scent may qualify for copyright protection. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.


Mark Verstraeten envstra it liked it Mar 15, Want to Read saving…. The recordings are an important public topic and they provide useful insight into the way the CIE handled the Endstra case.

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Refresh and try again.

Herriemaker marked it as to-read Dec 03, No intention to create a work is endsyra for obtaining copyright. Although Endstra undoubtedly thought about what he wanted and did not want to release to the detectives and therefore applied a certain selection, he did not intentionally couch his story in this design, which means that there is no copyrighted work.

Leonora added it Sep 24, Regina rated it liked it Jul 22, Kristof Langens rated it liked it Jun 09, Furthermore, in practical respect it is naturally very hard to find out whether a particular form was intentionally chosen. In the same year it was endstea affirmed that kinetic schemes may also be copyrighted.

On the contrary, given the banality of the design, it cannot be assumed that what was pronounced by Endstra was endstea on creative labour of any significance. If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries lexology. Endstra thought he was only transferring information hoping that on this basis the Criminal Intelligence Unit would catch Holleeder and his colleagues.


He was assassinated in broad daylight in May Furthermore, it may in practice be very hard to find out whether a particular form was intentionally chosen.

“Backseat conversations” not protected by copyright – Kluwer Copyright Blog

Among ttapes things, they asserted that the back seat conversations were conducted in an interview form and that these interviews were to be designated as a work for the purposes of the Copyright Act and therefore acquired copyright.

By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

Endstra told them that he was extorted for many millions by Willem Holleeder. These courts saw the conversations as a businesslike transfer of information.

Moreover, Holleeder and his associates already know the content of the official reports of the recordings due to the criminal proceedings, which are based on the Endstra tapes. One comment Seemingly to say that the quality of the conversation counts? Priscilla Lukus added it Apr 16,